top of page

Is EMDR Just Eye Movements? How EMDR Therapy Really Works

11 minutes ago
6 min read

EMDR therapist guiding a client through eye movements with two fingers in a therapy office.

Whenever I tell people I do EMDR, one of the first things I hear is:

“Oh, is that the therapy where you move your eyes back and forth?”

Yes.

But also… not really.

To be fair, EMDR stands for Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing, so the name itself is not doing us any favors. Eye movement is literally front and center.

And visually, it is the part people remember. A therapist moves their fingers, the client follows with their eyes, and from the outside that can look like the whole treatment.

It is not.

The more EMDR clinicians actually use EMDR therapy over time, the less they tend to focus on the mechanics of the eye movements themselves.

Early on, it is easy to get preoccupied with questions like:

How fast should I move my hand?How many passes?Which direction?Am I doing it correctly?

With more experience, the questions usually become much more clinical:

Why this target? Why this intervention? What is happening in the processing right now, and what does this client need next?

That shift—from performing the technique correctly to understanding why you are using it—is a very common part of becoming a more experienced EMDR therapist.

And that is where eye movement starts to look less like the centerpiece of EMDR and more like what it actually is:

one tool among many.


EMDR Eye Movements Are More Flexible Than Most People Think

People often picture EMDR eye movements as one very specific pattern:

left, right, left, right.

But even the eye movement itself can vary quite a bit.

It can be faster or slower. Horizontal, vertical, diagonal. Circular. Figure-eight patterns.

Sometimes the therapist’s hand is moving in ways that would look slightly ridiculous if someone watched the session on mute.

I have definitely had moments where I thought:

If somebody walked in right now with no context, this would be very hard to explain.

And then there is the bigger point:

EMDR does not always require eye movements at all.


EMDR Does Not Always Require Eye Movements

Infographic showing EMDR working-memory tasks including eye movements, tapping, counting, spelling, visual patterns, and movement.

Once you start looking at EMDR through a working-memory lens, the range of possible tasks gets much wider.

You might use counting.

Forward. Backward. Sometimes in a language the client is still learning.

You can use spelling tasks, rhythmic tapping, movement, coordination tasks, reaction tasks, or throwing a ball.

In EMDR training, I have done things that looked less like trauma therapy and more like a slightly chaotic PE class.

At one point I remember thinking:

Are we still doing EMDR, or did the hyperactive inner child in me take over and turn this into gym class?

But once you understand the working-memory theory behind these tasks, it starts to make a lot more sense.


How Working Memory May Help Explain EMDR

Diagram explaining how a distressing memory and a dual task compete for limited working-memory capacity during EMDR.

A simple way to think about working memory is as the brain’s temporary RAM.

There is only so much available at one time.

If you bring up a distressing memory, that memory is already using some of those resources.

Then I ask you to track my fingers.

Or spell something backward.

Or keep a tapping pattern going.

Or answer a cognitively demanding question while still holding the memory in mind.

Now the brain is trying to do two things at once.

That competition matters.

Research on working memory and EMDR suggests that when a distressing memory is held in mind while another demanding task is added, the memory may later feel less vivid and less emotionally intense.

So the useful part of EMDR eye movements may not be that moving the eyes left and right has some special or mysterious property.

At least part of the effect may simply be:

the eye movement is taking up working-memory space.

In other words, it is stealing RAM.


Why More Working-Memory Taxation Is Not Always Better

This is where the clinical part becomes more interesting.

If the task is too easy, it may not be doing much.

But if the task is so hard that the client is using every available brain cell trying to complete it, the target memory may no longer be meaningfully present either.

That is not the goal.

The therapist is constantly adjusting.

How much demand does this person need right now?

With this memory?

At this point in the processing?

Maybe we add more.

Maybe we reduce it.

Maybe we switch tasks entirely.

And the same client may need something very different with another target.

This is one of the reasons I find EMDR 2.0 so interesting.

The most useful idea is not simply:

“Look, we can do all these strange tasks during EMDR.”

It is the emphasis on asking:

Why am I adding this task right now?

What am I trying to change?

Is the memory still extremely vivid?

Has the emotional intensity stopped shifting?

Has the processing stalled?

Or have I already added so much cognitive load that I need to back off?

That is very different from:

“This is what I was taught to do at this point, so this is what I do.”


Eye Movements Are Only One Part of EMDR Therapy

This is also where people sometimes overcorrect.

Once they hear about working memory, they assume EMDR is basically a clever distraction exercise.

It is not.

Working-memory theory helps us think about what EMDR eye movements and other dual tasks may be doing during processing.

But EMDR therapy itself sits within the broader Adaptive Information Processing, or AIP, model.

The basic idea is that most experiences eventually get integrated.

You remember what happened, but the event becomes part of the past.

Some highly disturbing experiences do not seem to settle in the same way.

The images, emotions, body sensations, and beliefs from that moment may remain tightly linked within a memory network.

So someone can know perfectly well:

“That happened ten years ago.”

And yet when that memory network is triggered, the body responds as if it is happening now.

EMDR is not about deleting a memory.

It is not about convincing someone that something terrible was actually fine.

And it is definitely not about rewriting the past into a happier version.

The point is to help the memory become better integrated with information that is available now.

For example:

“I had no control then.”

can exist alongside:

“I have choices now.”

Or:

“No one protected me.”

can become connected with:

“I can protect myself now, and I can choose who I allow close to me.”

The facts do not change.

But the memory starts to feel more like something that happened, instead of something the nervous system is still treating as current.


What Experienced EMDR Therapists Look for During Processing

When I provide EMDR consultation to other clinicians, I am rarely most interested in whether someone moved their hand at exactly the right speed.

I am much more interested in questions like:

Why this target?

Why this intervention?

What are you noticing in the processing?

Is the memory still activated?

Is the client moving through meaningful associations, or are we losing the target?

Do we need more working-memory demand or less?

Did the intervention actually change anything?

And one of the questions I probably ask most often is:

“Why are you doing that right now?”

Not because the intervention is necessarily wrong.

I want the clinician to know what they are seeing and why they are choosing that next move.

That is the part that matters to me.

Not whether the hand movement looked textbook-perfect.


So, Is EMDR Really an Eye-Movement Therapy?

Technically, yes.

Again, the name is right there.

But eye movement is probably the easiest part of EMDR therapy to notice—and one of the easiest parts to mistake for the whole treatment.

Sometimes eye movement is very useful.

Sometimes it needs to be changed.

Sometimes another task works better.

Sometimes less is more.

The real clinical skill in EMDR is not moving your hand perfectly from side to side.

It is understanding what is happening in the processing, why you are using a particular intervention, and when to adjust.

So when someone says:

“EMDR is the one with the eye movements, right?”

I usually say:

“Yes. But the eye movements are the part you can see. They are not the whole story.”

And now I am curious:

If you have experienced EMDR therapy, did your therapist ever use something other than eye movements?

Comments


© Ally Counseling and Therapy

138 West 25th St, FL 8, New York, NY 10001

24-20 Jackson Ave, Long Island City, NY 11101

Unknown.png
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
bottom of page